Re: Is Weight Of Tyres A Concern To You?
edlms said:
the tyre weight is one of many factors when choosing a tyre. handling, noise, dry/wet grip, weight, sidewall thickness etc (leaving price out). therefore, maybe 10-20% weightage... for the rims, it's mainly about strength and weight for diameter size (leaving out looks and price). 50% weightage.
When you narrow down your parameters to performance-drivers, then essentially your tyre pick and your wheels picks are rather limited. If you are a performance-driven person, you would have less than a handful of tyre models to choose from. No diff for rims - less than a handful. Which would, ironically made everyone in this category choose more or less the same wheels/tyres?
For wheels, budget and style can be other considerations - hence Neez. Schmeiden and HRE Competition are out of reach to some as compared to say Advan, Volks or OZ. Wile weight is a consideration, the selection process is more multi-dimensional.
But for tyres, is that so in real life? Grip, compound and weight - that should narrow down to less than a handful of names - PS2, Pirelli Zero/Rosso, RE01R, CSC3, F1 Assymetric. So why are we seeing so many other brands like Yokohama, Federal, Dunlop being mentioned? Bear in mind the budget could be a concern, but strangely, not many bother to check on tyre weights at all !!!
Next meetup, take a look at some lightweight performance wheels shrodded in not-so-light not-so-performance tyres. Then you will know what I am talking about.
edlms said:
moreover, the difference is weight between competing tyres is 2/24lbs= +/- 8% but for competing rims could be up to 2/11kg =+/-19%. but I understand that the % weight difference on the rotational mass (tyre) may mean more difference than the %weight difference for the rim... it's just that there are many other things to think about when choosing a tyre that may outweight the difference in weight. this is a rough examples of the calculation but you get my meaning...
but to answer your question, yes it is a consideration but not a major one.
Refer to this thread:
http://www.bmw-sg.com/forums/suspen...s-equivalent-2.html?highlight=rotational+mass
If the factor is less than 2 times, that is, 4 kgs savings off 4 wheels to give up to 8 kg savings in overall weight effectively, then 4 kgs savings off 4 mounted tyres should also give up to 8 kg savings in overall weight. That is a crucial consideration if unsprung mass is a key parameter in the back of your mind. So why is this piece of info often ignored? Are we missing something here?