Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

playstation76 said:
Actually it would also be good if members dun carry the balls of the site sponsors.best is still to maintain a neutral stance

Quite tough. How to advise a forumer looking for a workshop without sounding with a bias? Any recommendation will sound like carrying balls - to some.

Which workshop is good? R2D, Carry balls.

Which tyreshop? Leong Seng or Hurry's. Carrying two sets of balls.

How to be neutral?
 
Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

Which workshop is good?
And the neutral answer would be.......

All site sponsors here are good = Might as well dont answer the question.

=p
 
Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

Actually, the most neutral answer will be - YOU GO TRY YOURSELF LOR !!!
 
Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

kenntona;1097970 said:
Actually, the most neutral answer will be - YOU GO TRY YOURSELF LOR !!!


Perfect answer.
And suck ball or suck co*k, to me is just friends fending for their friends, nothing wrong about it.
 
Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

Ban is one thing, you can't always get ahead of shit stirrers.
 
Re: Banning of Members for Malicious postings on Site Sponsor.

The Guardian;1097986 said:
Ban is one thing, you can't always get ahead of shit stirrers.

Maybe the police can look at this topic, contact admin, and get some leads so that arrest can be made asap
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
82,709
Messages
1,019,191
Members
70,199
Latest member
1jun88net
Ad | 📈Learn Trading Strategies, Lessons and Setups
Back
Top