Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

ipoh-horfun

Well-Known Member
Ma Chi, the Ferrari driver who died in a three-vehicle pile-up in May, has left behind an estate worth S$8.1 million, reported Lianhe Zaobao on Tuesday.

His wife He Ting Ting and two young daughters will inherit his estate while his widow and his mother Ma Xiao Ling will be administrators of the estate.

The fatal accident at the junction off Raffles Hospital in Bugis claimed three lives, including that of Ma, who was pronounced dead on arrival. The Sichuan native was driving a red Ferrari when it slammed against a taxi, which subsequently cut into the lane of a passing motorcycle.

Besides Ma, the high-speed crash also claimed the lives of 52-year-old taxi driver Cheng Teck Hock and his 41-year-old passenger Shigemi Ito. Another two people, 26-year-old motorcyclist Muhammad Najib Ghazali and 21-year-old Wu Wei Wei – who was the passenger in the Ferrari – were also injured.

As Ma reportedly did not leave a will, it is expected that the deceased’s spouse will inherit half of the estate while the remainder of the estate will be split equally among his children under Singapore law.

Insurance policies’ worth

Ma’s estate will include life insurance cover worth $2.8 million. Court documents stated that Ma had two insurance policies worth US$1 million (S1.25 million) and S$1.54 million. The rest of his assets were earnings from his job, said Lianhe Zaobao.

The Chinese daily also reported that He has made an application with the High Court to request that the family be exempted from the rule that administrators must nominate two guarantors when minors are beneficiaries of an inheritance.

Ma’s widow said that no one was willing to be guarantors for them as it was a personal family affair. She then promised that she and her mother-in-law would try their best to manage Ma’s estate, said Lianhe Zaobao.

Court documents also said that He is preparing to fight a court case with an insurer, however it is unclear which insurance company it is.

Dead Ferrari driver
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

soon we will hear his mom sueing the wife for the money...
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

8M isn't much for a so-called tycoon. toto has 20M and he wears fake Crocs shoes. I never say Ken told me one
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

too little la.. maybe hide other estate somewhere...


1 million policy is very common nowadays. only cost a $2000+ a year at his age.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

worth 10 million only ?? but drive a 2 million car ?? financial adviser some more ??
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Darth Vader;872711 said:
worth 10 million only ?? but drive a 2 million car ?? financial adviser some more ??

ok la, when he died , he don't enjoy the money. at least he enjoyed.

as long leave a few millions he was responsible enough.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Anyway take note, his AXA motor insurance might not pay due to "collision" not "accident".


life insurance better, all pays.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Conspiracy theorists say HSA's report that Ma's blood/urine showed no trace of alcohol gave a chance for an insurance claim from the cabbie's family.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

After this incident, with so many car in-built camera, think a new clause will emerge...

err.. as most of time an "accident" is a "collision" leh????
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe;872715 said:
Anyway take note, his AXA motor insurance might not pay due to "collision" not "accident".


life insurance better, all pays.


when it comes to payouts, I am amazed at how insurance companies can fight over semantics and definitions of "collision" and "accident"... A collision is involved in an accident, and in an accident, a collision occurs... pray tell how u get an accident without a collision?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
Anyway take note, his AXA motor insurance might not pay due to "collision" not "accident".

What's the technical difference between a "collision" and an "accident"?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

if ma is drunk, cabbie got $0 from insurance claim and have to do civil suit to sue ma's family?

i find that if drunk = no insurance claim is sibei archaic and not fair to victim
high percentage of accident was caused by drunk driver and victim (no drunk) died "injustice" :(

kenntona;872718 said:
Conspiracy theorists say HSA's report that Ma's blood/urine showed no trace of alcohol gave a chance for an insurance claim from the cabbie's family.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872722 said:
when it comes to payouts, I am amazed at how insurance companies can fight over semantics and definitions of "collision" and "accident"... A collision is involved in an accident, and in an accident, a collision occurs... pray tell how u get an accident without a collision?

you lawyer u tell me lot.. so can fight?

think "collision" is a result in delibrately "beat red light"...
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe;872727 said:
you lawyer u tell me lot.. so can fight?

you are inconsistent then.... in the first post, u were promoting life insurance being better cos car insurance may not pay due to the difference between "collision" and 'accident', but in the next post you asked whats the difference. Can you make up ur mind?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

nowadays not much difference between a tree branch n a cyclist, especially at 5am after a zouk outing.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872728 said:
you are inconsistent then.... in the first post, u were promoting life insurance being better cos car insurance may not pay due to the difference between "collision" and 'accident', but in the next post you asked whats the difference. Can you make up ur mind?

i say all life insurance pays regardless collision or accident.

i am talking about car insurance how come got different. Something new to me ....
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

brings me to a case recently....

X takes up travel insurance and which also insures against personal property loss.

X loses his iphone in a crowded street, most likely pickpocketed. X makes a police report and then makes a claim under the travel insurance.

Insurance company refuses to pay citing "NEGLIGENCE".

Pray tell how one gets pickpocketed DILIGENTLY?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
i am talking about car insurance how come got different. Something new to me ....

Is this new?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872731 said:
bring me to a case recently....

X takes up travel insurance and which also insures againt personal property loss.

X loses his iphone in a crowded street, most likely pickpocketed. X makes a police report and then makes a claim under the travel insurance.

Insurance company refuses to pay citing "NEGLIGENCE".

Pray tell how one gets pickpocketed DILIGENTLY?

Anyway Travel insurance only the "emergency evacuation" is the most important item.

X should claim that he run after the robber & not pick pocketed - don't say I say one.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

kenntona;872733 said:
Is this new?

haha never heard of... think the sum assured too high. normal car , insurance company will just pay.

is like suka suka "collision" then don't pay. like "negligence" then don't pay.
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
82,769
Messages
1,019,424
Members
78,670
Latest member
oxbett2com

Latest posts

Back
Top