Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
X should claim that he run after the robber & not pick pocketed - don't say I say one.

So if things are stolen, travel insurance does not cover? The definition of "personal property loss" becomes very narrow......
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872722 said:
when it comes to payouts, I am amazed at how insurance companies can fight over semantics and definitions of "collision" and "accident"... A collision is involved in an accident, and in an accident, a collision occurs... pray tell how u get an accident without a collision?

Insurance companies are run by business people after all, profits driven. Imagine someone who bought critical illnesses insurance, got early stage cancer but insurance company says must hit stage 4 and match the conditions stated in the contract then get payout. Such cases happen everyday.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
haha never heard of... think the sum assured too high. normal car , insurance company will just pay.

is like suka suka "collision" then don't pay. like "negligence" then don't pay.

Yeah, but how to define "collision" vs "accident"?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872731 said:
Pray tell how one gets pickpocketed DILIGENTLY?

if go overseas bar then drunk then kena molested by chiobu then wallet gone, is that covered under travel insruance?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Centurion9990;872740 said:
Insurance companies are run by business people after all, profits driven. Imagine someone who bought critical illnesses insurance, got early stage cancer but insurance company says must hit stage 4 and match the conditions stated in the contract then get payout. Such cases happen everyday.

actually u are wrong. You should find out more before u sign the proposal.
A lot still benefit from buying. And so far 19 years in the business, I should say 100% claims went thru, depending who service & do the claims for you. As for Car & Travel.. suka suka lor..
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Centurion9990;872740 said:
Insurance companies are run by business people after all, profits driven. Imagine someone who bought critical illnesses insurance, got early stage cancer but insurance company says must hit stage 4 and match the conditions stated in the contract then get payout. Such cases happen everyday.


yes I agree and thats why nowadays MUST read the T&Cs carefully word for word..because a phrase like "Total Permanent Disability" is defined differently by EVERY insurance company...

Taking a hand for example, one company only needs you to lose function of your master hand and its considered TPD, while another one I read requires that you lose both hands and hop around like a rabbit before they allow TPD claim
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

So is AXA implying that the driver is committing suicide since he is fully aware of his action which is "Collision" and not "Accident"?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

kenntona;872741 said:
Yeah, but how to define "collision" vs "accident"?

read today newspaper lor.. i also want know. file in high court last week.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

golfgti;872742 said:
if go overseas bar then drunk then kena molested by chiobu then wallet gone, is that covered under travel insruance?

should report as the girl punch you and took your wallet. anyway take note police report required.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
actually u are wrong. You should find out more before u sign the proposal.
A lot still benefit from buying. And so far 19 years in the business, I should say 100% claims went thru, depending who service & do the claims for you. As for Car & Travel.. suka suka lor..

The proposal is written in legal form even the most non-legal-trained elite might not fully understand the clauses. And that leaves "finding out" with two options: one, trust the agent. two, check with another agent from another agency.

I know of many who trusted the wrong agent, did not proof-read the contract and ended up buying the wrong policy.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe;872743 said:
actually u are wrong. You should find out more before u sign the proposal.
A lot still benefit from buying. And so far 19 years in the business, I should say 100% claims went thru, depending who service & do the claims for you. As for Car & Travel.. suka suka lor..

Seriously who really read word for word or have time to find out in detail when signing an insurance policy, especially friend is my agent.

"bro, this new plan very good. Pls support me as I need the production this mth, all terms is the same as last policy.. Pls sign" is what I commonly hear from my friend.. Chop chop 5mins then pay premium. I signed cos I trust that person.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

kenntona;872725 said:
What's the technical difference between a "collision" and an "accident"?

Same as "flood" and "ponding"......:dance:
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Centurion9990;872754 said:
Seriously who really read word for word or have time to find out in detail when signing an insurance policy, especially friend is my agent.

"bro, this new plan very good. Pls support me as I need the production this mth" is what I commonly hear from my friend..

Is still part of your responsibility to know la... anyway whatever you brought u forget in 12 months. review by agent needed from time to time.

sunriser8;872755 said:
Same as "flood" and "ponding"......:dance:

ya , the lawsuit on "collision" vs "accident' believed to be first such reported case in Singapore. I hope the AXA lose.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

Frankly speaking, if an experienced agent for 19 years could not decipher the legal differences on the definitions between "collison" and "accident", I am not sure how much more complexities (in favour of the insurance industry) have the legal clauses planted to snook the customers.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

kenntona;872758 said:
Frankly speaking, if an experienced agent for 19 years could not decipher the legal differences on the definitions between "collison" and "accident", I am not sure how much more complexities (in favour of the insurance industry) have the legal clauses planted to snook the customers.

haha anyway is first case in Singapore to reject liability as "collision", let see how it goes.

as for Ma life insurance 2.8million steady payout.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

ok then another question..

Agent sells me insurance because I need it or he needs the comms?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

insurers n lawyers...they go hand in hand...the lawyers crafted these fine prints no?
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

MW;872761 said:
ok then another question..

Agent sells me insurance because I need it or he needs the comms?

you know what you want when u brought so u need it.
u chosen the worst comm plan for agent too.
so you da man & know what you need.
 
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

totoseow;872762 said:
insurers n lawyers...they go hand in hand...the lawyers crafted these fine prints no?

lawyers act on clients' instructions. lawyers do not go crafting clauses because they very free and answer PMs asking for free legal advice.

so there is a difference. not fair to say insurers and lawyers go hand in hand

as long as there is a fee, we hold anyone's hands. lawyers are prostitutes
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Dead Ferrari driver’s estate valued at S$8.1 million

iScoupe said:
Is still part of your responsibility to know la... anyway whatever you brought u forget in 12 months. review by agent needed from time to time.

This is the crux of the argument.

Assuming client is legally-trained. Client needs to do his/her own due diligence on the contract, and rely on a minimal basis on the agent's recommendation on products. In truth, he is probably better to contruct his own portfolio by shopping around on pricing. Service requirement is very minimal.

Assuming client is NOT legal trained. There are lots of intepretation required from the part of the agent, who earns the commission. If he does a good job, he has obliged in his responsibilities. If he does not, there is an element of mis-representing or mis-selling.

Hence, it is not always the case the responsibility lies in the customer's hands.
 

Latest posts

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
82,769
Messages
1,019,424
Members
78,670
Latest member
oxbett2com

Latest posts

Back
Top