Thanks for all the different views
my 2 cents; yea, i kpkb here; They market the bmw pleasure points with pride; so my pleasure point is to know that I am not owning a lopsided or asymmetical ride that is so visually obvious to my naked eye (without tilting my head); that's my expectation, and meeting expectation means quality, and getting something not of quality negates the pleasure point as an unhappy customer. yes the car drives ok, so? That had never been my problem, the problem is with the product which they cannot fixed to my expectation/quality and i have the rights to disagree or reject the so call recommended specification of within tolerance that now by specification it is no longer a problem to them.
I am not unrealistic to demand 0mm difference. I am ok when with zero passengers no driver in the car, the asymmetrical issue is not so obvious to the naked eye (without tilting my head; some experts may ask me to do that), but it's not. if the good intend is to compensate for RHD drive, then driver side should be higher instead? without driver, but this case driver side is already lower even without driver inside, then now point to the original LHD design when they decide to make RHD car, if so, then they have not fixed the problem, and I have a problem, but by their definition of recommended specs it's now not a problem; then as I had mentioned, I have the rights to disagree or reject the recommended specs, going in circle ... consumer end up one way ....