Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

[Centurion9990]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Don't forget Pulau Hantu....

Sisters' islands also... some dunno abt this island right

 

[brosiss]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Don't you feel forsake when there is more foreigners than your own kind in your homeland?

Garmen will lose big votes when there is no clear citizen rights or benefits from non-citizens. Everyday, we have to fight for ourselves for transport, schools, jobs, eating space, medical fees, inflation, high property prices, etc due to poor planning for population influx.

Might as well I migrate to developed economy with substantial welfare for citizens with work life balance, since being Singaporean already a minority in homeland. No make no difference.

When garmen realised their forsaken voters foresake them then they realised they should be more decisive in citizens benefits and child benefits. Our garmen is very decisive in giving handouts to corporate subsiding payroll during the sub-prime crisis. How much money was that? This was very good because no retrenchment and we are able hit 14% growth when economy rebound. Why they sting on citizen benefits/previlages and child benefits? Because of low ROI? Or no tangible returns? Or investment too long, cannot see. Hope the current and future leaders can see longer term.

 

[kenntona]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

I like the fish tank example.

Throw more fishes inside the tank without changing water more often, upgrading filtration system, more oxygen.......what the fish....

BTW, where got nice fish tank to watch?

 

[Mockngbrd]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Don't you feel forsake when there is more foreigners than your own kind in your homeland?

Garmen will lose big votes when there is no clear citizen rights or benefits from non-citizens. Everyday, we have to fight for ourselves for transport, schools, jobs, eating space, medical fees, inflation, high property prices, etc due to poor planning for population influx.

Might as well I migrate to developed economy with substantial welfare for citizens with work life balance, since being Singaporean already a minority in homeland. No make no difference.

When garmen realised their forsaken voters foresake them then they realised they should be more decisive in citizens benefits and child benefits. Our garmen is very decisive in giving handouts to corporate subsiding payroll during the sub-prime crisis. How much money was that? This was very good because no retrenchment and we are able hit 14% growth when economy rebound. Why they sting on citizen benefits/previlages and child benefits? Because of low ROI? Or no tangible returns? Or investment too long, cannot see. Hope the current and future leaders can see longer term.

- Yes

- Gahmen wun lose much votes as long as they naturalize more imports

- They know other countries dun wan you and other country leg dun open as big as theirs

 

[DrK]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Don't you feel forsake when there is more foreigners than your own kind in your homeland?

Garmen will lose big votes when there is no clear citizen rights or benefits from non-citizens. Everyday, we have to fight for ourselves for transport, schools, jobs, eating space, medical fees, inflation, high property prices, etc due to poor planning for population influx.

Might as well I migrate to developed economy with substantial welfare for citizens with work life balance, since being Singaporean already a minority in homeland. No make no difference.

When garmen realised their forsaken voters foresake them then they realised they should be more decisive in citizens benefits and child benefits. Our garmen is very decisive in giving handouts to corporate subsiding payroll during the sub-prime crisis. How much money was that? This was very good because no retrenchment and we are able hit 14% growth when economy rebound. Why they sting on citizen benefits/previlages and child benefits? Because of low ROI? Or no tangible returns? Or investment too long, cannot see. Hope the current and future leaders can see longer term.

Hmm we hear you but I have to reiterate this again --> MIW will not give a fark to birth rights of born-bred Sporeans.

Here's why. In our short historical analysis spanning 47 years, how many times have we seen power, freedom and liberty to think, argue, debate and decide on national issues handed back to us, the citizens? Answer is NONE. And Papies will not contemplate to break this trend by giving people more say in this issue! It is said and it will be done. Simple as that. Bring in the foreigners at whatever cost. They will do it and there is only 1 way and that is their way. Have you ever seen compassion from MIWs? Not that I can remember. Results roll over rationale and rational rolls over sentiments. That is their way of running the shop and business in this country. We can all forget about the reversal in govt policies to stop at 5.5m, 6m or 7m. They know they will not lose votes. I mean they never lost an election right? They know they will not ever be replaced for another 20 years and that is why there is this air of arrogance and high-handedness to run our affairs just like the way they want to run us.

We are the muppets. Period. While we commiserate within ourselves, people outside think we have a magnificent and successful country. They envy us and adore us. Who will hear our pain? Only the 3.2m of us unfortunately.

 

[C3P0]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Not sure if anyone has been to hospitals' A&E recently.

It used to be bad. But now, wait for a bed also must wait for one day. Sart.

 

[Dinosaur hunter]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

Not sure if anyone has been to hospitals' A&E recently.

It used to be bad. But now, wait for a bed also must wait for one day. Sart.

Ive been to 2 hospital in taiwan. Efficient and reasonable prices considering im not a citizen and not covered by insurance there.

 

[Darth Vader]

Re: Singapore could accommodate six million people in future

i think you guys are mistaken, the pm didnt say 6 million, he said 6 million PLUS,meaning 6.9 million.