TCS keep talking cock

Probably the best way forward would be to raise anything to the newspaper forums lor... then hope and pray and see how.
 
kenntona said:
Amidst all the bo-liao chee-hong labelling shit, can I OT a bit and ask: why isn't CASE or some advertising standard board coming into play on those frivolous slimming programme advertisement?

Those lose 5-kg-in-a-week kind. Damn. I am glad I spent the $$$ on my fake PGIIs.

TCS and SPH being sheltered again? Deceptive advertising?

in singapore, there is an authority (watchdog) overseeing and the advertising rights and ethic.

MITA is the watchdog for all prints and MDA is the authority for airtime which includes radio and TV.

if you flip through these advertisments, please read between the lines.

they are not allow to promise or to swear that they can lose your weight but they can help you to lose your weight.

again, theare certain rules and regulations for advertisers to adhere and if any violation occurs, the mag or papers will be questioned and advertisers might face certain penalty and it applys to the media owners.

thanks
 
Still its fun to see the ads in other countries whereby the different competitors' brands are bashing each other silly.. haahhaha
 
Winston said:
Amidst all the bo-liao chee-hong labelling shit, can I OT a bit and ask: why isn't CASE or some advertising standard board coming into play on those frivolous slimming programme advertisement?

cos we all enjoy reading the ads in the straits times and Today? else we to get our daily dosage of porn?

Those lose 5-kg-in-a-week kind. Damn. I am glad I spent the $$$ on my fake PGIIs.

lucky you, else your ass split from squatting too long in the loo....

bros, please be informed that TCS had the name changed since 4 years ago and it is called Mediacorp now.

seriously though , SBC, TCS, Mediacorp, can you tell the difference? Bin Fen ba san (83) is not quite different from the shows today...

consmuers are not as ignorant these days and being mislead by advertisments.

thats why we consumers must stand up and let these sbc actors and actoress know that these kind of bull sponsoring of advertisements will hurt their image.

Singapore today as it is lacks consumer protection of any sort. CASE is a high profile toothless tiger prowling in a sea of sharks; read - not enough budget to fight these rich advertisers. Our system here is not pro-consumers, but pro-business to a larger extent. Hence, consumers here are subjected to a barrage of nonsense, and being best as who we are, we just keep quiet and hope for the best. My 2 pennies worth....

SBC - singapore broadcasting where 'di ba po tao' shows xing bing siao chuan', 'siao fei yu' and 'the net, wuan chong ren' starring chow weng fatt.

TCS - Television corporation of singapore where channel 8 shows the 'kopi o' and 'golden pillow' starring fann wong.

Mediacorp - channel 8 happy fish, channel 5 SI.

so, i think i see a very big diff from e above.

thanks
 
mart said:
...in singapore, there is an authority (watchdog) overseeing and the advertising rights and ethic.

MITA is the watchdog for all prints and MDA is the authority for airtime which includes radio and TV.

if you flip through these advertisments, please read between the lines.

they are not allow to promise or to swear that they can lose your weight but they can help you to lose your weight.

again, theare certain rules and regulations for advertisers to adhere and if any violation occurs, the mag or papers will be questioned and advertisers might face certain penalty and it applys to the media owners.

thanks

I wonder who lines your ricebowl? You seem very pro mediacorp
 
Bro, the caveat emptor term does not necessary apply in a general sense. Just read the headline of ST this morning, and you will understand why MAS has to step in to regulate the financial market. It is like pitting the banks against the laymen. MAS has to give the laymen some handicap.

Sadly, some segments of the consumer are still too ignorant about certain product claims, and require an independent body to protect them.

The deceptive methods of advertising has to be stopped.
 
SBC - singapore broadcasting where 'di ba po tao' shows xing bing siao chuan', 'siao fei yu' and 'the net, wuan chong ren' starring chow weng fatt.

TCS - Television corporation of singapore where channel 8 shows the 'kopi o' and 'golden pillow' starring fann wong.

Mediacorp - channel 8 happy family, channel 5 SI.


can see that u r a big drama fan...

Bro, the caveat emptor term does not necessary apply in a general sense. Just read the headline of ST this morning, and you will understand why MAS has to step in to regulate the financial market. It is like pitting the banks against the laymen. MAS has to give the laymen some handicap.

Sadly, some segments of the consumer are still too ignorant about certain product claims, and require an independent body to protect them.

The deceptive methods of advertising has to be stopped.

Not just a handicap, but a level playing ground. 1 consumer up against the bank or multi-million billion gazillion company is useless.....
 
Winston said:
SBC - singapore broadcasting where 'di ba po tao' shows xing bing siao chuan', 'siao fei yu' and 'the net, wuan chong ren' starring chow weng fatt.

TCS - Television corporation of singapore where channel 8 shows the 'kopi o' and 'golden pillow' starring fann wong.

Mediacorp - channel 8 happy family, channel 5 SI.


can see that u r a big drama fan...

Bro, the caveat emptor term does not necessary apply in a general sense. Just read the headline of ST this morning, and you will understand why MAS has to step in to regulate the financial market. It is like pitting the banks against the laymen. MAS has to give the laymen some handicap.

Sadly, some segments of the consumer are still too ignorant about certain product claims, and require an independent body to protect them.

The deceptive methods of advertising has to be stopped.

Not just a handicap, but a level playing ground. 1 consumer up against the bank or multi-million billion gazillion company is useless.....

bro, deceptive advertisments are more controlled these days and i think as a consumer, we should always stay prudent when it comes a decision on purchasing.

CASE gets very tough with scams but if a consumer goes to CASE and say, ' i fork out $10k for some unit trust with a bank and now i lost all my money in it, can you help me?' what you guys think?
 
but you see.. the way the banks advertise is that do not do a full disclosure of all the costs and charges involved in the unit trusts... they can say I guarentee you a 2% return on your money but what they don't say is is that they charge you 3% admin and mgt fee... heheh
 
mart said:
bro, deceptive advertisments are more controlled these days and i think as a consumer, we should always stay prudent when it comes a decision on purchasing.

CASE gets very tough with scams but if a consumer goes to CASE and say, ' i fork out $10k for some unit trust with a bank and now i lost all my money in it, can you help me?' what you guys think?

Bro, a deception is a deception. If a bank teller unstates the risks of a financial product and peddle it to an old lady who has no knowledge of the bare essentials of finance, who's gonna step in? CASE will not bother, unless some rhetoric are blown across the media. MAS stands to lose out as a regulator if these cases are left to their own devices.

Which reminds me of the pressure-selling tactics of some time-share programs. It is good that now you have 3-days cooling-off period......

I'd believe most consumers are educated and prudent. But under various circumstances, especially when information is assymetrical, consumers tend to be "pressured" into making a commitment which is longer-term in nature. This is made worse when there are "fine prints" in the contracts which is legible only to the legal-trained.

Ask yourself - when was the last time you spend the entire night reading through all the clauses and disclaimers in an account opening form, or a visa card application form?
 
Err... Kenn, actually, I do read through all the clauses and disclaimers... hahaha!
 
MRacer77 said:
but you see.. the way the banks advertise is that do not do a full disclosure of all the costs and charges involved in the unit trusts... they can say I guarentee you a 2% return on your money but what they don't say is is that they charge you 3% admin and mgt fee... heheh

bro, i totally agree with you.

let me state an example;

buyer went shopping for a house.

he got a budget of $90k in cash and $90 in cpf to pay for the DP.

he bought a unit at $800k.

his commitment - $160k DP.

cash - $80k, cpf $80k.

so while he was shopping, i think he would done his homework knowing that besides the above mentioned, he needs to pay for stamp fees and legal fees etc.

when he confirmed the purchase, he would ask questions like what is the stamp fees like and how much is legal fees for a unit that cost $800k, etc.

bank says minimum guarantee 2% return, but did they say by when?

even if they do, there is always a disclaimer clause below every ad that says: subject to terms and conditions or to change without prior notice, etc.

and that disclaimer itself served a big purpose and it protects the advertiser when dispute or miscommunication surface between consumer and advertisers.

thanks
 
hey mart, good points, but then we've got no beef with the artistes themselves. it's the "advert" that is misleading. With that, a formal guest appearance from Fiona Xie at our next meetup would be in order. pls arrange, thanks.

the segment is made into an "educational" piece, like those adverts where they teach kids to rest their eyes after using computer for too long, stop speeding or a car will crash into a manequinn, stop smoking or when you cut up a lamb's brain blood will ooze out.

so people DO take these advices, as the advert is made more genuine by NOT mentioning that you should pump Shell only. It's disguised by being generic.

So people will come to think that their fuel tanks are still made of metal like in the 1850s and will rust if not pumped to the brim. This is a gross case of misinformation. The other 2 points of shutting off engine when not in use, and accelerating like a guniang are still valid though.
 
kenntona said:
mart said:
bro, deceptive advertisments are more controlled these days and i think as a consumer, we should always stay prudent when it comes a decision on purchasing.

CASE gets very tough with scams but if a consumer goes to CASE and say, ' i fork out $10k for some unit trust with a bank and now i lost all my money in it, can you help me?' what you guys think?

Bro, a deception is a deception. If a bank teller unstates the risks of a financial product and peddle it to an old lady who has no knowledge of the bare essentials of finance, who's gonna step in? CASE will not bother, unless some rhetoric are blown across the media. MAS stands to lose out as a regulator if these cases are left to their own devices.

Which reminds me of the pressure-selling tactics of some time-share programs. It is good that now you have 3-days cooling-off period......

I'd believe most consumers are educated and prudent. But under various circumstances, especially when information is assymetrical, consumers tend to be "pressured" into making a commitment which is longer-term in nature. This is made worse when there are "fine prints" in the contracts which is legible only to the legal-trained.

Ask yourself - when was the last time you spend the entire night reading through all the clauses and disclaimers in an account opening form, or a visa card application form?

bro, hmm..i read every fine print when i purchase or apply for anything in general.

but, like what you said, it will be unfair to the older folks who are not so literate or can hardly read that 2pt font size behind or within the contract and these pool of consumers are the one who will be preyed on.
 
Racebred said:
hey mart, good points, but then we've got no beef with the artistes themselves. it's the "advert" that is misleading. With that, a formal guest appearance from Fiona Xie at our next meetup would be in order. pls arrange, thanks.

the segment is made into an "educational" piece, like those adverts where they teach kids to rest their eyes after using computer for too long, stop speeding or a car will crash into a manequinn, stop smoking or when you cut up a lamb's brain blood will ooze out.

so people DO take these advices, as the advert is made more genuine by NOT mentioning that you should pump Shell only. It's disguised by being generic.

So people will come to think that their fuel tanks are still made of metal like in the 1850s and will rust if not pumped to the brim. This is a gross case of misinformation. The other 2 points of shutting off engine when not in use, and accelerating like a guniang are still valid though.


bro, jacelyn can? hahaha...
 
Cannot get Fiona or Jacelyn, I will be reluctant but happy to see Jeanette Aw or Kym Ng.

Cheryl Fox?

Damn, OT again......
 
bro, i will try to get at least 'patricia mok' for you lah...

steady rite!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
82,734
Messages
1,019,262
Members
73,600
Latest member
hanhtrinhtuoitrevn

Latest posts

Ad | 📈Learn Trading Strategies, Lessons and Setups
Back
Top