The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
- Thread starter kenntona
- Start date
jonleeck
Well-Known Member
Re: The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
he already admitted
"They said that when we played against Stoke, for instance, and in that case they were right. I invented a foul because we were drawing and I wanted to win."
NOT I SAY! IS SURESH SAY DE!!!
so watch simi replay?...oh...very good acting har?
Sprawler;945702 said:
he already admitted
"They said that when we played against Stoke, for instance, and in that case they were right. I invented a foul because we were drawing and I wanted to win."
NOT I SAY! IS SURESH SAY DE!!!
so watch simi replay?...oh...very good acting har?
yellowhandman
Well-Known Member
Re: The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
The ball "boy" is 17 years old. And the newspapers have reported that he tweeted before the game that he would be stationed behind the home goal because he was "needed for time wasting". Ridiculous.
Hazard was foolish and can't complain about getting a red (although I think what he really did was only to toe poke the ball out from under the boy - the boy then feigned injury). But irks me that the boy gets away scot free with cheating. Apparently it was also the last time the boy was going to be a ball boy, so he knew there was no threat of being banned from future duty, etc.
That only Hazard is punished is an ever worse example to young kids than his actual behaviour.
The ball "boy" is 17 years old. And the newspapers have reported that he tweeted before the game that he would be stationed behind the home goal because he was "needed for time wasting". Ridiculous.
Hazard was foolish and can't complain about getting a red (although I think what he really did was only to toe poke the ball out from under the boy - the boy then feigned injury). But irks me that the boy gets away scot free with cheating. Apparently it was also the last time the boy was going to be a ball boy, so he knew there was no threat of being banned from future duty, etc.
That only Hazard is punished is an ever worse example to young kids than his actual behaviour.
Re: The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
Surely Hazard did not know that the ballboy has harboured funny intentions when he kicked him?
Post mortem analysis of the boy's intention should have little bearings on Hazard's thought process when he did it.....
yellowhandman said:
Surely Hazard did not know that the ballboy has harboured funny intentions when he kicked him?
Post mortem analysis of the boy's intention should have little bearings on Hazard's thought process when he did it.....
yellowhandman
Well-Known Member
Re: The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
My point is that the boy is also to blame for provoking the incident, and it's clear that he had intended to waste time if given the opoortunity. Whether Hazard knew that is irrelevant - but it shows that there was some justification in Hazard's frustration with the boy's behaviour.
BTW I'm not even a Chelski fan...just find it really irritating and unfair that the party who started the whole thing gets away with nothing, whereas Hazard is being vilified in the press as some kind of bully.
kenntona;948961 said:
My point is that the boy is also to blame for provoking the incident, and it's clear that he had intended to waste time if given the opoortunity. Whether Hazard knew that is irrelevant - but it shows that there was some justification in Hazard's frustration with the boy's behaviour.
BTW I'm not even a Chelski fan...just find it really irritating and unfair that the party who started the whole thing gets away with nothing, whereas Hazard is being vilified in the press as some kind of bully.
