Red_Bean_Bun
Well-Known Member
Looking at the way the arguments are being brought up by the opposition -
1. Release the monetary reserves becasue its being squandered by bad investments anyway...
2. Foreign Talent robbing our rice bowls
3. Housing pricing are too high
4. cost of living is too high
The only pro-locals policy that I have seen implemented are those in Malaysia - The Bumi policies. Notice how the parallels are being drawn -
1. Government uses reserves to subsidise essential items
2. Companies must have a local (Bumi) to be a shareholder
3. Foreign ownership of properties are restricted
4. See item 1.
If the opposition intends to form a government with these ideas - we have to leave Singapore.
1. Using the reserves to subsidise essential items so as to reduce the cost of living is like divesting your parents investment portfolio to pay your bills.
2. Pro-local policies would not attract foreign investment. You may say who needs foreign money but we do not have natural resources. Even water is a problem. Singapore started as a entrepot trading port and currently still is. Needs both buyers and sellers (trade) to survive.
Singaporeans back in the 60s-70s are hungrier. Today I find people "whinier" becoming less competitive. This would give foreigner who are hungry an opportunity.
How did the natives felt in the 1700s when Chinese immigrants flooded Singapura ? Pretty much the same thing.
If Singaporeans are going to continue to have a whiney attitude then expects either one of the 2 things -
1. Government to go Bumi to protect the locals
2. We get throughly overrun by the more hungrier foreigners
Too little focus on values in the education system - results in the current generation of whiners.
1. Release the monetary reserves becasue its being squandered by bad investments anyway...
2. Foreign Talent robbing our rice bowls
3. Housing pricing are too high
4. cost of living is too high
The only pro-locals policy that I have seen implemented are those in Malaysia - The Bumi policies. Notice how the parallels are being drawn -
1. Government uses reserves to subsidise essential items
2. Companies must have a local (Bumi) to be a shareholder
3. Foreign ownership of properties are restricted
4. See item 1.
If the opposition intends to form a government with these ideas - we have to leave Singapore.
1. Using the reserves to subsidise essential items so as to reduce the cost of living is like divesting your parents investment portfolio to pay your bills.
2. Pro-local policies would not attract foreign investment. You may say who needs foreign money but we do not have natural resources. Even water is a problem. Singapore started as a entrepot trading port and currently still is. Needs both buyers and sellers (trade) to survive.
Singaporeans back in the 60s-70s are hungrier. Today I find people "whinier" becoming less competitive. This would give foreigner who are hungry an opportunity.
How did the natives felt in the 1700s when Chinese immigrants flooded Singapura ? Pretty much the same thing.
If Singaporeans are going to continue to have a whiney attitude then expects either one of the 2 things -
1. Government to go Bumi to protect the locals
2. We get throughly overrun by the more hungrier foreigners
Too little focus on values in the education system - results in the current generation of whiners.