nYteMarE;342628 said:The M-aero, sans splitters or the 3D lip, is only so so. With splitters however, the M-aero looks really good. With 3D lip, it's got a bit of the WTCC look.
For the splitters, are you referring to this?
///M3;342630 said:Lumma front and M-aero rear sweee...go for it
+1. To balance out, defuser at back should also be CFnYteMarE;342640 said:Yes. You can have CF splitters instead as well! I think they look really good.
+1..dun care abt what others say..if u like what u think,and got $$..Do it!!nYteMarE;342647 said:I can't really envision how it'd look like, but you may end up breaking the flow with splitters from another design. That's why till now I've not been able to find the right side skirts.
But then again, if you think it's nice, what other people think is secondary. It's your car your money.
nYteMarE;342647 said:But then again, if you think it's nice, what other people think is secondary. It's your car your money.
Terry;342679 said:the mtech for the E90 not so nice imho... the e92/93 ones are nice but not in the e90 imho..
Haha Terry, few months back wanted to change the bodykits and I talked to Mike, he said the same thing.
As for Lumma, I like the front and side but not the rear, another setback I have to forgo the foglights.
Jadis;342720 said:Terry;342679 said:the mtech for the E90 not so nice imho... the e92/93 ones are nice but not in the e90 imho..
Haha Terry, few months back wanted to change the bodykits and I talked to Mike, he said the same thing.
As for Lumma, I like the front and side but not the rear, another setback I have to forgo the foglights.
mindfulness;342940 said:Jadis,
Ever considered this?
Kerscher Tuning