Re: Test-driven:528 f10 vs 525 e60
The 520/523 owners were not expecting the same attributes described in this thread, and hence in the many years of the e60 life cycle you have seen e60 owners complaining about the inadequate delivery of the 520/523 or even 525 and hence the Velocity/Powerbox types of mods (or even supercharging for that matter). Drawing the parallel with the 3 series, had the smaller c.c. models come with better output numbers, that part of the equation would have been addressed.
I think going forward, it is not the number of cylinders per se, but the way the power are delivered on efficiency basis. On the same note, many M purists dread the phasing out of high revving NA Ms....... but in few years' time, we might look back into the twin turbo M platform and be amazed how V8 and V10 have given way to V6 TT and V8 TT......
Actually I believe the IL6 owners have to be differentiated - the owners of the 520/523 do not quite expect the same "refinement" as the 530 owners, for instance.st8800 said:Just that historically, many people that bought the 5 series expected refinement. 4 potters doesn't offer that.... even those with twin scroll turbo with big torque numbers.
The 520/523 owners were not expecting the same attributes described in this thread, and hence in the many years of the e60 life cycle you have seen e60 owners complaining about the inadequate delivery of the 520/523 or even 525 and hence the Velocity/Powerbox types of mods (or even supercharging for that matter). Drawing the parallel with the 3 series, had the smaller c.c. models come with better output numbers, that part of the equation would have been addressed.
I think going forward, it is not the number of cylinders per se, but the way the power are delivered on efficiency basis. On the same note, many M purists dread the phasing out of high revving NA Ms....... but in few years' time, we might look back into the twin turbo M platform and be amazed how V8 and V10 have given way to V6 TT and V8 TT......