Porsche 991 C2S Driven
Called up my fren in Stuttgart yesterday afternoon and the C2S happened to be available for test drive so headed down to sample it myself...
The long story short, I was not impressed. I tried separating the issues i encountered into genuine dislikes (d) and "matter of getting used to. (u)" What really shocked me the most was that i dislike the interior design quite a bit. It has never been mentioned in any reviews i have read, but the damn signal stalk (d) looks to have been raided from the parts bin of Saab when they went belly up. It looked and felt like a thinner version of the crappy signal stalk in the Saab 95/93 from a decade ago. I do not expect this in a car of this league. My fren was shaking his head at that as well. In fact, he was all praise for the new Boxster and kept asking me to try it out even before i started the C2S drive.
Steering (u): Some slag off center like most steering, but a little less compared to my M3. Once loaded, it is very responsive and accurate. A loaded C2S steering is a tad more direct and responsive than the M3. However, while there is quite a bit of feedback when loaded, the feedback felt a bit artificial unlike the natural feel of the M3's. The steering is a also too light for my liking and the wheel lacks girth. This i figure, is becos i am so used to the meaty wheels on M cars.
Suspension: Not much to report here. It felt firm, but pliant, so ok.
Interior Ergonomics (d): Buttons galore and the dash board is a mess. The speedo is puny and hard to check out the speed cos they used only half a circle to illustrate quite a big speed range. The tacho dominates too much. Here on SG roads, i need to know my speed quickly for obvious reason, but maybe on the track, having the tacho in the middle could be useful. The test car did not come with a generous leather interior, so it was nothing spectacular on the inside, but nothing a few leather options can't solve. The gear knob felt too tall and girly (u), but this is prob cos i am so used to the short and simple looking M knob. I noticed the brake pedal is set up for left foot braking as it's located quite a fair bit to the left. The car also has a small turning radius and felt agile.
Drive train: (d) The PDK is no match for the M-DCT in terms of speed and responsiveness. The sound the M-DCT makes is also more visceral and mechanical. The PDK at auto mode is nothing like the telepathic M-DCT at D5 even when set to Sports mode. It is smoother when potting around at low speed however and moves when you take the foot off the brakes. My wife will love that. The test car did not come with Sports exhaust. It takes some getting used to having the sound coming exclusively from behind. The engine note is no where near the music produced by the S65 V8. The engine does rev eagerly and is deceptively fast in a similar fashion like the M3, but with less drama. The test car came with crappy push/pull shifter. I have had experience with push/pull shifters in my previous 2 1-series and they felt pretty ok and intuitive. The way the push is implemented is not intuitive on the Porker. You are pushing it into the steering wheel like a button. Fail on the shifters. Their test car should have the optional paddle shifters and nothing else.
Conclusion: No-go as far as upgrade is concerned. I walked away from the test drive taking away nothing with me as far as likes are concerned. I had expected more
![Frown :( :(]()
If only the next generation Aston Vantage is upon us now. The current model is too dated to be a viable option...