jasonmaxima;1032485 said:which more wu hua? OPC or non-opc cars in this instance?
Meek;1032507 said:This year's card is "game changer".
Never had time to recover from the previous changes and new changes come in liao.
Radon39;1032508 said:my young Padawan, 'in life, the only constant is CHANGE'...bloody live w it....muahahahaa
Wind_Talker;1032520 said:I saw in MCF that many MCFers kpkb about coes and suggest government tag coe to engine power, now they really do that and so many people complaining?
Radon39;1032508 said:my young Padawan, 'in life, the only constant is CHANGE'...bloody live w it....muahahahaa
jasonmaxima;1032523 said:I reckon tag coe to engine power say.... 200bhp or 180bhp... at least more sense...
130bhp?? seriously???
Wind_Talker;1032520 said:I saw in MCF that many MCFers kpkb about coes and suggest government tag coe to engine power, now they really do that and so many people complaining?
kenntona;1032531 said:Sorry, but how does tagging COE to higher engine power solve car congestion problems?
kenntona;1032531 said:Sorry, but how does tagging COE to higher engine power solve car congestion problems?
rvt;1032537 said:I think it causes more congestion problem.
More affordability, more cars on the road, more congestion. But also mean, more ERP lah!!
wt_know said:the tweak of coe system is not to solve congestion
it is to make allocation "fairer" wor - so to speak
CAT A - bread and butter ... white bread + butter (not imported type ... ntuc home brand type)
CAT B - all other car is considered premium