KSE90;591436 said:Hi All,
I am thinking of getting a 07-08 320i. just wanted to verify on the stock HP. Thought it should read at 156hp? How come i see that some bros ride stock is btw 110-130hp?
Thanks
pbear1973;591461 said:It's probably the way the bhp is measured. Bimmer probably measures it on an engine dyno. I.e. a dyno with the load connected directly to the output shaft of the engine. All the dynos done here are chassis dynos, which measure power at the wheels and then use some sort of mathematical model to back-calculate the engine power. In addition to an imperfect model, chassis dynos probably suffer from other losses as well like wheel slippage, loss of power through the torque converter etc.
Hence the vastly different values. If you can get 150+ bhp on a chassis dyno, you have a real keeper.
KSE90;591466 said:Just to make sure i understand all these technical terms correctly. are you saying, theoretically & technically all bimmers should have the bhp as advertised. But different measurement methods derive to different result...,
pengful;591528 said:See if this makes sense to you... http://www.bmw-sg.com/forums/engine...tuned-jerk-before-stop-gone-2.html#post590832
pbear1973;591540 said:Makes sense.. also as an engineer I cannot see how you can accurately estimate flywheel hp based on readings taken from the wheels. There's too much variability and randomness in everything between the dyno and the engine. Slippage between the wheel and the dyno, losses in the differential, drive shaft, gearbox, etc. My guess is that the model used to estimate the engine figures are just based on typical figures.
I'm guessing that bimmer should be fairly accurate - give or (more likely) take 10 bhp - in their numbers, seeing that they never got into the trouble that Ford and Mazda did.
To also answer your question in that other thread; yeah my jerk-before-stop is gone too.
KSE90;591551 said:Well well, this is easier for a layman like to me to understand. Thanks!
More practical way to feel the differences is to pay "school fees" to whoever the tuner i will be going to when i do get my ride
Cheers.
firehorse;591035 said:hi all,
Just to share my tuning result by Alan from BOSS.
After driving the car for a year in stock form, feel the urge to want to improve the sluggishness when moving off from stationary.
2 weeks ago, went there for servicing as well as beef up my pre-owned E90 320i (year 2005).
Now the gear change feel smoother for the lower gears, pick up is better and moving off from stationary has significantly improved.
The Dyno results:
Stock:
Motor Pow. 153.2 Cv
Wheel Pow. 119.6 Cv
Loss Pow. 26.6 Cv @ 6069 RPM
Eng. Torque 212.1 Nm @ 3319 Rpm
Tuned:
Motor Pow. 174.2 Cv
Wheel Pow. 132.1 Cv
Loss Pow. 33.0 Cv @ 6311 RPM
Eng. Torque 230.1 Nm @ 4396 Rpm
Nic told me that the car can squeeze out a few more ponies if I replaced my stock spark plugs & air filter. Anyway, one thing at a time and meantime enjoying my drive with its extra power.
pengful;591662 said:Dude, can you post your dyno chart? I am curious how a 320 can push out the number of horses you indicated. 2005 engines are different? Tks.
firehorse;591776 said:I'm not good at this stuff, will try to snap a picture of the chart and put it up.
It is a PML car I bought from PPSL last year.
firehorse;592245 said:The label shown is N46B20B
Here is the Dyno Chart
firehorse;592247 said:Thanks Bro, can kindly enlighthen me the diff between N46B20B and N46NB20 ?
firehorse;592245 said:
firehorse;592270 said:Thanks Bro pbear & wt_know.
Thought Sprint Booster only give better throttle feel and doesn't add any power.
Other than the tunning by BOSS, the whole car is still in stock condition.