toiletsiao
Well-Known Member
Re: The Barclays Premiership / Champions League Thread
I am concerned about the recent dominace of EPL teams..when i say recent..i meant a few years ago not since the formation of EPL.. as recent as 2004/05 season u can start seeing the pattern developing..
2004 - 2005 - Winners Liverpool Finalist AC Milan ( Semis - Chelsea, PSV)
2005 -2006 - Winners Barca Finalist Ars (Semis Villareal, AC)
2006 - 2007 - Winners AC Milan Finalist Liverpool (Semis -Man Utd, Chelsea)
2007 - 2008 - Winners Man Utd Finalist Chelsea (Semis - Liverpool, Barca)
I hope you see the pattern..especially for the past 2 seasons before ...the champs league contains 3 EPL teams in the semis...what a big YAWN...to me I'm a neutral..and i find it damn boring to see this kind of match ups...How many chelsea liverpool semi finals must i watch..wah lau....
Funny how you mentioned Porto .. Since it won it in 2003 they have virtually become also rans in the compeition..almost their their core is sold to chelsea their manager included...
Its killing competition ...They might not have the best single player but the fact is somehow they managed to purchase the best set of players to a team in recent time..and i think this will be the trend for yrs to come..it might have started a few years ago..
I am speaking from a neutral soccer fan's standpoint..not as a BPL fan.
________
BustyHottness
Breyton;421450 said:The EPL's dominance today was not achieved overnight. And yet, despite this supposed 'dominance' they have had fewer wins in Europe than the Spanish and the Italians since the EPL's inception (English wins = 3, Spanish = 5, Italian = 4). In that same period, the Germans have won it twice and the French, Dutch and Portuguese have all won it once. And the wins by clubs from different countries have been more or less evenly spread over that period - it's not like the 3 English wins have been concentrated over the past few years. That's the beauty of the Champions League. Supposedly 'lesser' teams like Porto can knock 'giants' like Man Utd out and go on to win it.
I am concerned about the recent dominace of EPL teams..when i say recent..i meant a few years ago not since the formation of EPL.. as recent as 2004/05 season u can start seeing the pattern developing..
2004 - 2005 - Winners Liverpool Finalist AC Milan ( Semis - Chelsea, PSV)
2005 -2006 - Winners Barca Finalist Ars (Semis Villareal, AC)
2006 - 2007 - Winners AC Milan Finalist Liverpool (Semis -Man Utd, Chelsea)
2007 - 2008 - Winners Man Utd Finalist Chelsea (Semis - Liverpool, Barca)
I hope you see the pattern..especially for the past 2 seasons before ...the champs league contains 3 EPL teams in the semis...what a big YAWN...to me I'm a neutral..and i find it damn boring to see this kind of match ups...How many chelsea liverpool semi finals must i watch..wah lau....
Funny how you mentioned Porto .. Since it won it in 2003 they have virtually become also rans in the compeition..almost their their core is sold to chelsea their manager included...
Money dont buy you success..but it definately makes things alot alot easierBreyton;421450 said:No doubt the EPL is the richest league, most televised league, attracts the best players, etc. The EPL's commercial success stemmed from forward-thinking early on, prudent deals with TV networks and marketing efforts since then. And then came the fad of billionaires buying EPL clubs as their newest toys. But we have all seen that money doesn't guarantee success on the pitch.
Breyton;421450 said:Anyway, as Kenn says, the process is too far along to reverse. I am just wondering what are the 'macro level' negatives that the EPL has on the sport?
Its killing competition ...They might not have the best single player but the fact is somehow they managed to purchase the best set of players to a team in recent time..and i think this will be the trend for yrs to come..it might have started a few years ago..
I am speaking from a neutral soccer fan's standpoint..not as a BPL fan.
________
BustyHottness
Last edited by a moderator: